Consumers' Colour Preferences

One of the many challenges in product design is making colour choices. It feels (and is) extremely
personal, but new research gives us some clues about what consumers want.
Quite a lot of research has been done on individual colours, their connotations and how they influence
consumer behaviour.
Much of this is driven by the unconscious associations people have with those colours. For instance, if
red has frequently been associated with warning signs or danger, it is helpful that our unconscious minds have
adapted to notice that colour first: it wouldn't be great if we allowed ourselves to get distracted by the millions
of other visual elements in the landscape when what we need to see is the "Beware of imminent death" sign someone
has considerately placed next to a hazard.
As I wrote about previously, these unconscious associations can have unexpected consequences.
But what about the use of different colours? Starkly contrasting colours might catch the eye (although
blocks of one colour have been shown to be very effective too), but do these appeal to consumers more or less than
colours that are closer together?
Researchers recently made use of the NIKEiD customer training shoe design service to explore how customers
chose to combine colour themselves.
With NIKEiD you pick a basic model and then select the colours you want for the different panels of the
shoe (in all there are seven elements you must choose colours for including the logo).
The team analysed the designs people made and used the CIELAB color space model to gauge how close or
distant the colours they selected were to each other.
They discovered that people chose a small palette of closely matched colours for their shoes, although a
large minority also selected one contrasting accent colour, typically for the special sole that was a signature
component of the shoe.
To explore whether this was just a consequence of designing the shoe, the researchers also asked people to
pick from one of four Nike-designed shoes on the website. They found that people chose the designs that combined
similar colours rather than those that had a mix of contrasting ones.
I own a pair myself and my design was very much in keeping with what the researchers
discovered.
What drives this preference is intriguing. It feels to me that there is something confident and assured
about a less contrasting design, and conversely something anxious and attention-seeking about a wild combination of
colourse. Apple products are a great example of designs that use minimal contrasting colour to feel elegant and
confident.
As children we are often much more daring with colour and have far less regard for what 'works' and what
doesn't. But before long we learn to become more colour co-ordinated. Similarly, young children notice everything
in a shop and want to stop and touch everything, whereas as adults we learn to screen out most of what's
present.
I suspect that it is in this pattern-checking dimension of the unconscious mind that consumer preferences
for closely-grouped colour emerge. Once we own something we don't want to add to the distractions around
us.
When it comes to designing products that customers buy with aesthetic considerations, choosing colours
that work well together, rather than contrasting them, is probably a wise choice.
Source: Xiaoyan Deng, Sam K. Hui, J.
Wesley Hutchinson.Consumer preferences for color combinations: An empirical analysis of similarity-based color
relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2010; 20 (4): 476 DOI: 10.1016

|